×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Module II Development Bonuses & Signs

Review and comment on the draft Development Bonuse and Sign standards.

These two Divisions of Module II contain the standards for density bonuses and signage. About half of the available density bonuses exist today and the remainder are new. Most of the sign standards are unchanged from existing standards but have been reorganized. You can learn more about both by watching this brief video.

Please share any thoughts you have about Administration with us. Your comments will be used to shape the future drafts of ATL Zoning 2.0.

Please comment by April 30, 2025, to ensure that your ideas are reflected in the Revised Discussion Draft Version 1 of the new Zoning Ordinace.  

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

in reply to 404forever's comment
Good to know! Thanks for the correction.
Suggestion
I'm glad these affordable units will be protected for 20 years.
in reply to 404forever's comment
Answer
Thanks for your comment. This is not entirely true, as the area within 1/2 mile of high-capacity transit already has parking maximums that limit the amount of parking that can be provided. These maximums will remain.
Suggestion
Transit is unsustainable without density, and density unworkable without transit. Increased FAR means more available housing units, increasing supply and lowering rents. Let’s make it appealing to build big near transit by increasing the FAR bonus.
Suggestion
50% is very high. This essentially means that if a developer wants x spots for tenants, they’d have to build 2x spaces! Why are we encouraging parking in our urban core near transit? I ask to remove the parking stipulation and simply add the density bonus near transit, or, at the very least, reduce it to below 25% mandated public parking.